Punjab Assembly: opposition criticises finance department absences during budget debate

Tensions flared in the Punjab Assembly as opposition members sharply criticized the government for the repeated absence of senior finance department officials during the ongoing budget debate, calling it a waste of lawmakers’ time and public funds.

Opposition MPA Ahmar Bhatti questioned the purpose of holding discussions when no one from the finance side was present to respond or take notes.

“Who are we addressing? What is the point of this discussion when there is no one to respond?” Bhatti asked, describing the absences as a violation of the assembly’s privileges.

He emphasized that either the finance secretary or special secretary must be present during budget-related discussions a requirement previously reinforced by the deputy speaker on three occasions. Bhatti also pointed out that millions of rupees are spent on assembly sessions, and the absence of senior officials amounts to squandering both taxpayers’ money and lawmakers’ time.

The House was informed that Finance Minister Mujtaba Shujaur Rehman could not attend due to illness. While a deputy secretary was present, the higher-ranking secretary and special secretary were missing, sparking renewed criticism from the opposition.

Panel of Chairpersons member Raja Shaukat Bhatti acknowledged the opposition’s concerns, noting the deputy secretary’s attendance but agreeing that the secretary or special secretary should be summoned to ensure proper engagement.

The proceedings were ultimately adjourned until Tuesday, February 4, 2026, leaving the budget debate unresolved amid a procedural standoff.

Why This Matters to Punjabis

This is not the first time bureaucratic absences have disrupted assembly business, highlighting accountability gaps in the provincial government’s handling of fiscal matters. Budget debates directly impact everyday life, as funding for schools, hospitals, roads, agriculture, and relief programs depends on thorough scrutiny and active engagement. When key officials are absent, empty chairs delay decisions, prevent meaningful discussion, and slow the implementation of policies that affect public services. Opposition claims further underline broader concerns over transparency, governance, and accountability, particularly when public funds are at stake.

As Punjab moves forward with its budget process amid economic pressures, the assembly’s opposition has sent a clear message: lawmakers deserve direct answers from officials controlling the province’s finances not empty chairs.

The treasury benches have yet to address this recurring issue, keeping attention on whether the government will ensure full attendance in future sessions.