- Web Desk
- 2 Hours ago
Supreme Court’s decision to nullify NAB amendments challenged
-
- Web Desk Javed Somroo
- Oct 13, 2023
ISLAMABAD: In a significant development within the Pakistani legal system, Advocate Farooq H Naik has filed a revision appeal challenging the Supreme Court’s recent decision against the NAB (National Accountability Bureau) amendments.
The case revolves around the alleged infringement of fundamental rights, legal requirements, and the accountability process, with plaintiff Abdul Jabbar as the primary petitioner.
The Supreme Court’s decision against the NAB amendments was rendered without hearing the concerns and arguments of the petitioners, the petition alleged. Advocates and legal experts believe that this appeal could potentially reshape the landscape of accountability procedures in the country.
ANF’s nationwide crackdown yields major drug busts
Advocate Farooq H Naik, a prominent legal figure known for his expertise in constitutional matters, has taken up the cause of Abdul Jabbar. Jabbar found himself facing an accountability court reference after the NAB amendments came into effect, leading to this legal challenge.
In their petition, the plaintiff emphasizes that no violation of fundamental rights has been identified in the amendments. The Supreme Court’s decision is being viewed as a departure from established legal norms and principles. The application against the NAB amendments is argued to have met all constitutional and legal requirements, contrary to the Supreme Court’s initial judgment.
The petitioners are now requesting the Supreme Court to annul its decision against the NAB amendments, a significant legal step that could potentially impact the future direction of accountability processes within the nation.
This case is expected to be closely monitored by legal scholars, politicians, and the public, as it represents a critical juncture in the ongoing struggle for accountability and the protection of fundamental rights within Pakistan. The outcome of this revision appeal could have far-reaching implications on the NAB amendments and the accountability proceedings that follow.